Just read Blinkymummy’s post about the indignation that homosexuals feel in Singapore. Though Singapore may not be the most liberal country in the world, there are worse places to be born a homosexual. In any case if you stop to think about it, aren’t there bigger things to worry about?
I’ll try to present an attempt at both sides of the argument. Firstly, to the heterosexuals: Gays and lesbians are people who prefer to have sex with the same sex. That’s it. That’s one measely aspect of a person’s character. Beyond that, they are like all of us: there are the good, the bad, and there are the mediocre. So don’t get your knickers in a twist - they are not going to bring about the end of the world.
To the homosexuals: so what if Singapore does not let you hold a party? I know that it’s been allowed over the years but you’ve survived this long and this far that I’m sure you’d realise that the party is also only one aspect of your lifestyle. You’re still allowed to hold events and such - just not the parties. As for the publications, worse come to worse you’ve got the Net. You still have your freedom of voice. Hey if you want to console yourself, be glad that you weren’t born just across the Johor Strait. I can assure you that you guys got it better than your brethren in Malaysia. Party? What party?!
And to put everything into perspective, I saw Moby Beng’s comment and went on to see his post about the simple life that cats and dogs lead. It’s so poignant. Yes, humans are sentient beings and our intelligence prevents us from living truly simple lives but there’s a lot to be learnt from animals who are easily contented. And there’s no hatred based on trivial matters such as skin colour, sexual orientation, social class and religion.

Snoop, my hyper Staffordshire Terrier cross
11 Responses to “Life should be simple”
Leave a Reply
You might also be interested in these
- 3 things that make me cheerful
- My brother, a man of contrasts
- How do I stay happy?
- Happiness
- Female Archetypes - I like!

That’s one measely aspect of a person’s character.
Perhaps. But for some (usually the most vocal), their sexual orientation IS what they are. Did you see “Chasing Amy”? In one scene she yells, “I’m gay! That’s who I am!” That always pissed me off, because my sexuality is, as you say, one measly aspect of my character. I have a whole mess of other things in my life more important than who I want to bang. (And boy, was that a long list!) Anyway…
Some people (be they gay, straight, liberal, conservative, yuppie, hippie, whatever) have chosen something to value and they want everyone else to go along with their program. Hey, be gay. Not my business, and no skin off my nose. But if we disagree and your happiness depends on having the whole world agree with you (or accept things they’re not willing to accept), then you’re in for a miserable life. (I’m referring specifically to a gay former friend who hadn’t fully accepted his homosexuality, so he made it his mission in life to convince the world that being gay is OK, so they could in turn convince him HE was OK. Sad.)
(Did I stay on point? It’s past my bedtime.)
I’ll see your Terrier and raise you a Rottweiler!
curtis: valid points. I agree with you about alienating ppl when you try to cram something down their throats (alright alright, we get that you are gay!). Some other blogger (can’t remember which) made a point that “look, we are ok that you are gay but the world does not revolve around you and you only!!!” or something to that effect.
What I was trying to say in my post is that both sides need to chill the f**k down. There are more important things in the world to worry about.
Rottweiler?! Ok you beat me.
Some thoughts:
Yes, being gay is merely an aspect of someone’s life, but then again, look at how people stereotype gay men:
1. fashion savvy
2. camp
3. cultured
4. effeminate
(In vague relation to this, Bruce’s housemate has this quirky definition:
metrosexual: a term used for a fashion concious male, ie. a homosexual in denial.)
Don’t those definitions cut across other spheres of life? Does this then mean that someone can have varying extents of homosexuality in their life??
Ouch. Head hurts.
Cute doggy btw. =)
metrosexual: a term used for a fashion concious male, ie. a homosexual in denial.
Hahahahah…….there maybe some element of truth in that.
But hey you know what, women are partly at fault for encouraging this behavious because you like the fact that men are paying more attn to their appearance and hygiene and shit. 
Kinda mind-blowing ain’t it???
You’re right tho - all those definition cut across all walks of life. I’ve known heterosexual guys who are a bit effeminate. It’s all varying degrees of a muchness.
which leads back to your point: animals lead such simple lives. If only we could attain their levels of contentment.
starry: we can’t do it 100% like them but there are things that we can learn for sure.
maybe it’s time for a list of such lessons…?
starry: another challenge!? Hahaah, I’ll see what I can flesh out into a post.
bah, you still owe us an interview with your parents. =p
starry: damn I was hoping you would’ve forgotten. Whaahhahaha….don’t rush me ok? gotta make it good reading right.
slowpoke =p