Comments on: Porn is not real

By: Leonard

Leonard — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 04:30:43 +0000

huh! glad you tell me… i must change my pervert *oops* mentality liao…

nothing in porn is equal to real life…no wonder i feel sad after each session…

nothing in real could equal porn…printed in my mind now…to myself happy!

By: mooiness

mooiness — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:56:46 +0000

smashp0p: cool ain’t it. There’s more at ThinkGeek.com

Simplysiti: well if they had created a whole genre of porn for it, you can be pretty sure there are men who are excited by it.

I could point you to some sites but I’m sure you can search for them yourself.

By: Simplysiti

Simplysiti — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:42:31 +0000

Oh man… what blokey comments. Hahaha.

You know, I am quite confused, are men excited or disgusted by women who squirts (calling us “squirters” makes us sound like some type of squid!)?

By: smashpOp

smashpOp — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:09:56 +0000

im not sure whats it aout but i like the tshirt

By: mooiness

mooiness — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:36:57 +0000

emiriyo: holy smokes! Wow you came across a real gusher!? Woohoo! But yeah messy ain’t it? At the very least you will need to change the sheets after.

Yes unfortunately, the phenomenon may be real but the women who can do it are far in between. But just because a woman is not gushing out like a tap, it doesn’t mean she’s not having a good time.

Most of the times, it’s a trickle more than a gush.

By: emiriyoshikawa

emiriyoshikawa — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:43:41 +0000

You mean to tell all my Squirt.com video are fake?!! I’ve wasted a life time looking for a squirter and now then you tell me? ARRRrrrrrgh!

jokes aside, I did came across a gusher, that was fun… but real messy and troublesome… plus she too old for me.

By: mooiness

mooiness — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:38:15 +0000

Fatboi Slim: fellow geeks, unite!

By: Fatboi Slim

Fatboi Slim — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:36:34 +0000

I think the “segmentation fault” thing was added for humour too. It usually occurs when a program messes up some memory, most of the time by doing something with a NULL pointer. The man command shouldn’t give such an error just because it fails to find a manual entry.

By: mooiness

mooiness — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:33:56 +0000

rob: woohoo, good pun there – “no manual entry for woman”. Guess we have to help them out more then. Ho ho ho.

I think the “segmentation fault” thing was added in for effect.

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:20:00 +0000

just tried the man woman command on red hat.
> man woman
No manual entry for woman

does this mean that women do masturbate less than men.

I wonder which flavour (OS) causes a core dump?