<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double standards in religious rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>I see, I hear and I feel. And then I blog it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wa Salaam</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-10204</link>
		<dc:creator>Wa Salaam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-10204</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Double Standards...&lt;/strong&gt;

I would like recommend a post entitled, &#8220;Two Standards&#8221; by a sister over in Egypt (al-Mesr). I thought it was real and insightful. The post compares ideas and behaviors that are respectable in the Western World however, become detestable if...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Double Standards&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I would like recommend a post entitled, &#8220;Two Standards&#8221; by a sister over in Egypt (al-Mesr). I thought it was real and insightful. The post compares ideas and behaviors that are respectable in the Western World however, become detestable if&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9805</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9805</guid>
		<description>I think essentially most religions are good. The concepts of generousity, reciprocity and good will are pretty much universal and they are good guidelines on how to live life.
It&#039;s the politicians/kings/mullahs/popes etc... that twist these teachings into evil to achieve their own goals of power and greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think essentially most religions are good. The concepts of generousity, reciprocity and good will are pretty much universal and they are good guidelines on how to live life.<br />
It&#8217;s the politicians/kings/mullahs/popes etc&#8230; that twist these teachings into evil to achieve their own goals of power and greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooiness</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9755</link>
		<dc:creator>mooiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9755</guid>
		<description>Lyn: the problem is, we are not talking about being blind anymore - we have ppl willing to die. That just takes it to a whole new level.

Impetuousman: vicious circle, round and round we go.

girlstar7: if you ask me, organised religion is a fallacy. Just like your examples, not only are there Muslims fighting Christians, they are also fighting amongst themselves - all depending on how you interpret the *same* holy books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyn: the problem is, we are not talking about being blind anymore &#8211; we have ppl willing to die. That just takes it to a whole new level.</p>
<p>Impetuousman: vicious circle, round and round we go.</p>
<p>girlstar7: if you ask me, organised religion is a fallacy. Just like your examples, not only are there Muslims fighting Christians, they are also fighting amongst themselves &#8211; all depending on how you interpret the *same* holy books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girlstar7</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9754</link>
		<dc:creator>girlstar7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9754</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your last sentence.  I don&#039;t follow any particular religion either for a very similar reason.  if there is a God, why is there such sadness in this world?  why are there so many children starving, so many wars going on?  and religion is the cause of so many wars and has been throughout history.  not just Muslims vs. Christians but look at the Catholics vs. Protestants in Northern Ireland.  I mean, they are both Christians as well!  
  very sad, but we should consider ourselves lucky (as you said in your last post) that we are NOT living in a war zone and that we can afford to live comfortably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your last sentence.  I don&#8217;t follow any particular religion either for a very similar reason.  if there is a God, why is there such sadness in this world?  why are there so many children starving, so many wars going on?  and religion is the cause of so many wars and has been throughout history.  not just Muslims vs. Christians but look at the Catholics vs. Protestants in Northern Ireland.  I mean, they are both Christians as well!<br />
  very sad, but we should consider ourselves lucky (as you said in your last post) that we are NOT living in a war zone and that we can afford to live comfortably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impetuousman</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9753</link>
		<dc:creator>Impetuousman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9753</guid>
		<description>Let he who has no sin cast the first stone. 
When they ask for an apology, think who needs to apologize first... 
but of coz, why bother to ask anyway? 
They don&#039;t think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let he who has no sin cast the first stone.<br />
When they ask for an apology, think who needs to apologize first&#8230;<br />
but of coz, why bother to ask anyway?<br />
They don&#8217;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9744</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9744</guid>
		<description>An eye for an eye, make the whole world blind...

The &#039;WOUND&#039; is already too deep for both religions...

Hence, I seriously think this religions arguments will still go on for decades to come, unless some MIRACLE happens i guess...=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An eye for an eye, make the whole world blind&#8230;</p>
<p>The &#8216;WOUND&#8217; is already too deep for both religions&#8230;</p>
<p>Hence, I seriously think this religions arguments will still go on for decades to come, unless some MIRACLE happens i guess&#8230;=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C L O S E R</title>
		<link>http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-9740</link>
		<dc:creator>C L O S E R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooiness.com/2006/09/15/double-standards-in-religious-rhetoric/#comment-9740</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Blessed Balance Between Reason and Religion...&lt;/strong&gt;

The choice of the regnal name Benedict, which in Latin means &#8220;the blessed,&#8221; is significant. Pope Benedict XVI carefully chose his name (which means &#8216;the blessed&#8217;):

Filled with sentiments of awe and thanksgiving, I wish to speak...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Blessed Balance Between Reason and Religion&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The choice of the regnal name Benedict, which in Latin means &#8220;the blessed,&#8221; is significant. Pope Benedict XVI carefully chose his name (which means &#8216;the blessed&#8217;):</p>
<p>Filled with sentiments of awe and thanksgiving, I wish to speak&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

