Here’s the thing about dogs.

From what I know (via my parents), we can touch dogs but only when their fur/skin are dry. We can’t touch their tongue, obviously cos they’re wet. ‘Cos when we touch wet dogs (or any part of them that are wet), we have to go through a certain cleansing “ritual” which is a bit tedious to me. I’ve been unlucky few times so I can vouch for that.

So we can touch but it’s better not to touch dogs. In general, we just sum it up as “dogs aren’t allowed to be touched”. To make things “easier”.

The 2 women you saw on the train yesterday was kinda shocked too, maybe? Hence they just stood up abruptly and moved to another carriage? We don’t allow pets (let alone durian) in the train here so that’s a different story altogether. I wouldn’t have acted as “loud” as the 2 women for sure. Just be like “wide-eyed”, wait a minute or two, get up and walk to another carriage like nothing happened.

Ever since the “fear of Islam” happened years ago, I try not to read articles about “Islam Vs West” or anything similar to that effect. I know that we’re not all a bad bunch. And I know you know that as well. Because of 1 bad banana, all of us are/can/maybe considered bad. Sad really. I do agree that there must be compromise, give-and-take, that sorta thing between both parties. But why some of them cannot or bend around the rest of the people, it’s probably because the problem was started by some people in the rest of the people “group”. Like for example, the cartoon thing. True that in Islam, any images depicting the Prophet (pbuh) are not allowed. Unfortunately, in that country where it originated from, most of us know that the govt. cannot control the media, unlike you-know-where. And unfortunately too, in countries where most of them were probably being “brain-washed” into “actions speak louder than words”. Literally. I don’t support those actions, period. Islam does not teach Muslims to do such a thing. Those who acted in such violent ways are probable examples of people who do not really understood the actual context of Islam and being a Muslim.

About what the Pope said… It was only in ancient times that Muslims (at that time) had to defend themselves against those who sought to destroy them, with an intention to “wipe-out” the religion as well as the Prophet (pbuh). That was why wars existed. Which brings me to another point that.. “Jihad” for the sake of what all those people do in the name of Allah, is not “Jihad”. Again, misinterpretation in their part and by doing so they misrepresent the name of Islam and being Muslims.

It’s because of those “group” of people who choose to act without thinking (and probably without praying and seeking answers from Him) that makes people like me sometimes wonder how safe will I be living in another country and bringing up children 1-2 years from now. Can I still use the name “Muhammad” for my son? Can I use “Bin” or “Binte” to reflect that the child is a boy or girl? Will he/she be a target of hatred or ridicule? Kinda scary thought, man. That’s also why I choose not to wear the “hijab” or head-covering, for now.

IMHO, as long as we remember to respect, give-and-take and compromise, then we should be alright. I always say that when you’re in another country, whether you’re a PR or not, you’re still a tourist. So abide by the rules, behave in a good manner and never ever pissed off any of the locals. Oh. And smile. Being a Singaporean who’s used to strict rules and laws helps too.

We Muslim are well aware of this and of the importance of treating animals with respect. You might find this article of interest (Animal Rights in Islam) and these two ahadith. In the first of the two ahadith, the person is often named as a prostitute, whose sins were forgiven for having given water to the dog.

“Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as sayings: A person suffered from intense thirst while on a journey, when he found a well. He climbed down into it and drank (water) and then came out and saw a dog lolling its tongue on account of thirst and eating the moistened earth. The person said: This dog has suffered from thirst as I had suffered from it. He climbed down into the well, filled his shoe with water, then caught it in his mouth until he climbed up and made the dog drink it. So Allah appreciated this act of his and pardoned him. Then (the Companions around him) said: Allah’s Messenger, is there for us a reward even for (serving) such animals? He said: Yes, there is a reward for service to every living animal.” (Muslim: 26:5577)

“I also saw in it (in Hell) the owner of a cat whom she had tied and did not feed her nor set her free so that she could eat the creatures of the earth, till the cat died of starvation.” (Muslim: 4:1976)

@ Mooiness: “f you want ppl to be respectful and tactful towards you, you have to do the same and stop being antagonistic to everything that goes against your religion.”

For the first part of your sentence (up to the “and”), I would wholeheartedly agree. For the second half I disagree. But as I also pointed out in my last comment, I don’t necessarily see where moving away from a dog necessarily equates “being antagonistic.” I can think of several reasons why they might have moved away that has nothing to do with Islam. But even if they did move away for religious reasons, why should you care? Based on what you’ve said so far, I can’t see what all the fuss was about, unless there’s something more to the story. Something they said, perhaps? And that’s why it seems to me like the problem is more yours than theirs.

Islamophobia exist in western society because of bad press coverage from suicide bombers, extrimist, terrorist. Most people don’t realize that, large majority of muslim people are good decent, hardworking people.

In Indonesia, there has been violence against christian missionaries, churches burned, etc. Why ? because they associate christianity with western society, which they associate with general moral decline, the war in middle east, which they view as attacking their muslim brothers.

I tend to aggree with the last paragraph, if the roles are reversed for example, if you go a muslim nation during the fasting month, i.e. Indonesia, you wouldn’t eat a fried chicken on the street, because people would stare at you, because you stand out. Restaurants would have to cover their window up, to avoid offending the people who are fasting.

What I’m trying to say is that, we’re all made of the same stuff. We’re just human.

JDsg: the way the world is today, it is unfortunate that everything that a Muslim do, whether man, woman or child will reflect on the greater Muslim community at large. And like it or not, most Western perception of Islam is formed by how Muslim minorities behave in Western societies.

That said, I don’t think it’s unfair to expect everyone to be tactful. If the situation was reversed, and a couple of people stood up to get away from two Muslim women, the women should and are entitled to feel outraged.

So my point again is this: if you want ppl to be respectful and tactful towards you, you have to do the same and stop being antagonistic to everything that goes against your religion.

And if that last paragraph does not appease you, then we shall just have to agree to disagree.

That may very well be; we’ll never know for certain because you’re the only one reporting this. (Maybe someone had simultaneously cut loose a silent fart, and they were trying to escape the stink; we don’t know.) Be that as it may, they made a “dramatic move” and that offended your sensibilities because they weren’t tactful enough. How does that promote Islamophobia? Women make dramatic move. Women are Muslim. Therefore, people fear Muslims because… why? What you want is for Muslims to conform to whatever it is that you think is appropriate. Tact is fine, although I don’t see where the fact that they moved further away is all that tactless, “dramatically” or not. “Reciprocity” is a rather vague term, and could mean anything. Are you offended because Muslims won’t drink a beer with you? (I expect you’ll say no; it’s a rhetorical question.)

The point is that you expect “them” to conform to whatever it is that you think is right. That’s the basis for Islamophobia. “They” are not “us,” and until they become one of “us,” we need to fear them. The non-Islamophobic person says they are not like us, but so what? Different strokes for different folks. Until you can empathize with the other, you’re going to continue to carry that seed of Islamophobia.

FWIW, I grew up around dogs and like them immensely.

Personally, I think there is no point in being a devout follower of any faith/religion if you can`t even treat others with courtesy.

Jeremy: exactly, respect have to go both ways.