Starryluvly said in “Does Tomorrow have a Tomorrow?”:
Really, the editors at Tomorrow are not doing any favours for themselves. If I submitted a site calling XX a bitch and a whore, fine don’t publish it. Obviously it wasn’t that, otherwise the two editors wouldn’t have published it in the first place. I doubt the two editors would have published it without reading the article I posted – if they didn’t that why the hell are they editors in the first place?
I totally agree. If you purport to be an unbiased disseminator of interesting articles in and around the Singaporean blogosphere, then this action of pulling down a published article is very unseemly. It reeks of bias and a complete lack of objectivity.
Tomorrow.sg, please explain yourselves.
James Seng said, “because i revoke my vote and that no other editors choose to click publish?” I guess that explains it then. It’s still a mockery of the process, that you editors had set in place yourselves.